Blogging to blog, a non-wedding post
It's about 2:25am on a Tuesday morning here in Hawaii. I think it's almost been two weeks since my last University of Hawaii football game, and I can tell you that I'm still riding on a high. That Washington game was some game. Remarkable...just remarkable.
But as I was catching up on the news today, my high spirits basically fell a little. The reason? Well, as I read the news today, I realized how upside down the world has become since my father's generation. Kmart and Sears are no longer calling their Christmas trees....."Christmas Trees." They are just calling them "trees..." At one of our larger malls, Ward Center, they are not calling calling this holiday, a Christmas Holiday, but they are calling it "Festival of Gifts month." Isn't that just insane?
Then I take a look at today's sentencing for Michael Vick. He got 23 months in federal prison for cruelty to animals and being the head huncho in an underground dog fighting gambling ring. Is he an idiot...yes. Is what he did wrong and disgusting? Yes. But does he deserve this stiff of a sentence and his entire NFL career to end? No. He should have the chance to redeem himself, to bring himself back from this low. And with this sentence, it looks as though his NFL career is basically over. Now you're probably wondering why I feel this way about Michael Vick. Well, in a way, he is a victim here as well. Don't get me wrong, again, what he did was horrible. But did you see the hate that accumulated toward him for his actions. He had the animal rights group, angry protesters, you name it, calling for his head on a stick. Now that's all fine and dandy. But where is the same anger when we learn of a sick child molester in our neighborhood? Where is the anger then? How about just plain ol murderers who are sentenced in federal prison. Where are the angry mobs then? Why are these child molesters and murderers getting a lighter sentence than Michael Vick, and getting out early on good behavior? Why can they (the child rapist and murderers) plead insanity and not even go to jail? Why are there more groups that advocate that rapist, murderers, and child molesters should have the chance to redeem themselves in society, and not Michael Vick? There's a very sick double standard here.....

Guilty as charged, but too stiff a penalty?
If the roles were reversed, and six white kids beat up on a black kid, it would definitely be charged as attempted murder and a hate crime. Again, there is a very sick double standard here.... And I know about other instances that happened in Jena, which look as though black kids looked as though they were judged unfairly, but that is a separate case, nothing to do with the Jena Six. The Jena Six are not victims here, they are the assaulter and should not be freed, but charged for their crime whether that'd be aggravated assault or attempted murder.

Jena Six the victims after beating up a white kid unconscious
But the great news is that there is a population in America, still believes in its classical culture and values. There is still a small group of couples out there that want to tie the knot, and I am happy to provide that service for you. Well that's all for my post for tonight people. I'm sure you learned more about this plain old fashion 30 year old wedding guy today.




2 Comments:
At 5:02 AM,
Anonymous said…
Justin Barker, the victim in the Jena Six attack, wasn't one of the three students who hung the nooses at Jena High School. Hanging stuff beneath the tree was a tradition, especially during football season. The three white students who hung nooses from the tree said they did it to poke fun at friends who were members of the school rodeo team, an idea they said they got from the lynching scene in the movie Lonesome Dove. They admitted hanging the nooses, but said they were unaware the nooses might be construed as a racial threat. Federal agents and local authorities who investigated the incident are on the record saying they believe the three students are telling the truth. Two separate investigations absolved the three students.
State Welfare Supervisor Melinda Edwards, who supervised the three student’s counseling, said it might surprise everyone to learn that the three students did not have knowledge of black history in relation to that hanging of black citizens in the south during the civil rights movement. “We discussed this in great detail with those students,” Edwards told the Jena Times. “They honestly had no knowledge of the history concerning nooses and black citizens. This may seem hard to believe for some people, but this is exactly what everyone on the committee determined.” She also said that once the historical significance of the nooses was revealed to the students and how it was considered a tremendous insult to those of the black race, they showed great remorse. “When they were told about the historical relevance of the nooses and how others would interpret their actions, they really were very remorseful,” she said. “I can honestly say that these boys regretted tremendously ever hanging those nooses.”
Jena school superintendent Roy Breithaupt said, “Even though we’d determined their true motivation had nothing to do with racial hate, we had to acknowledge that to the black community it would be perceived in that manner. Therefore, severe action was taken regarding the students and the hanging of the nooses.” Breithaupt said the results of the investigations into the noose-hanging incident were not publicized because of state laws that prohibit releasing information about student disciplinary action. “We were bound by law to keep the results of the investigation confidential,” explained Superintendent Breithaupt many months later.
Following the Jena High School beating incidence, the Justice Department reopened its investigation into the noose-hanging incident and found no link to the assault on Justin Barker or other confrontations between black and white students. Donald Washington, U.S. attorney for the Western District of Louisiana, told CNN that "A lot of things happened between the noose hanging and the fight occurring, and we have arrived at the conclusion that the fight itself had no connection." He added that "We could not prove that, because the statements of the students themselves do not make any mention of nooses, of trees, of the 'N' word or any other word of racial hate."
The motivation for the Jena Six attack on white student Justin Barker has been firmly established by witness testimony. The members of the Jena Six were angry at Barker because they heard he had been talking about a fight at a private party between one of their members and a 22-year-old white male. The fight at the private party occurred three days prior to the Jena Six attack. The noose-hanging incident occurred three months early on the second day of school.
At 11:02 AM,
Steve Young said…
very good article.... So this article proves that his was truly aggravated assault, or in what I personally would consider attempted murder. And that Justin Baker, is truly a victim.
Post a Comment
<< Home